An affiliate of Martine Law, serving Texas, Minnesota, North Carolina and New Jersey. In Texas, legal services are provided by Texas Criminal Defense Attorneys PLLC, 325 N St. Paul Street, Suite 3129, Dallas, TX 75201.
Conspiracy in Texas Organized Criminal Activity Cases
Understand agreement and overt-act requirements under Texas Chapter 71 and why organized-crime conspiracy differs from general assumptions.
In short: Chapter 71 defines conspiring to commit through an agreement and required overt acts in furtherance of it. An agreement may be inferred from conduct, but the statutory requirements still must be proved. The organized-activity context and the listed intended offense remain essential parts of the analysis.
Explore this page 9 sections
Must there be a written agreement?
No. Section 71.01 permits inference from the parties’ acts. That does not make every shared message an agreement. Counsel should examine the proposed inference and plausible competing explanations.
Does an agreement alone complete the statutory analysis?
No. The definition includes overt-act requirements, and section 71.02 supplies additional elements. Identify who allegedly agreed, what offense was contemplated and which acts are said to further it.
Is conspiracy automatically punished less severely?
Not under the general assumption sometimes applied to incomplete crimes. Section 71.02(c) provides that conspiracy under that section is punished in the same manner as an offense under it. Counsel must calculate exposure under the correct statute.
A practical example and questions for counsel
Hypothetical example: Suppose a group conversation contains ambiguous discussion followed by separate acts. Counsel should identify the proposed agreement, each alleged participant’s conduct and the overt acts said to advance it. Membership in the chat is not a substitute for that analysis. Read the entire exchange and preserve attribution information, because a forwarded message and an authored message are different. The legal review must also connect the intended offense to the Chapter 71 list and the applicable organizational theory rather than rely only on the existence of coordinated communication.
How this fits Texas law
Chapter 71 adds requirements beyond an underlying offense. It addresses specified intent involving a combination, or the listed gang or organization routes, together with committing or conspiring to commit a listed offense. A combination has a statutory definition involving at least three people. Multiple defendants do not automatically establish organized criminal activity.
How do I get started?
The first consultation is free. It is with a Director of Client Engagement, not an attorney. Clients who hire us work with an attorney. Call (214) 239-2013. Phones are answered 24/7, with AI covering when no staff is free.
Last updated October 2026
Common questions
Must there be a written agreement?
No.
Does an agreement alone complete the statutory analysis?
No.
Is conspiracy automatically punished less severely?
Not under the general assumption sometimes applied to incomplete crimes.
Protecting Good People During Hard Times
Do not wait for your court date to get help. Call (214) 239-2013.
Phones are answered 24/7, with AI covering when no staff is free.
This page provides general information about Texas law. It is not legal advice, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship.