An affiliate of Martine Law, serving Texas, Minnesota, North Carolina and New Jersey. In Texas, legal services are provided by Texas Criminal Defense Attorneys PLLC, 325 N St. Paul Street, Suite 3129, Dallas, TX 75201.
Organized Crime vs. Multiple Defendants in Texas
Learn why multiple defendants do not automatically establish Texas engaging-in-organized-criminal-activity charges under Chapter 71.
In short: Texas organized criminal activity requires the additional elements of section 71.02, not simply two or more people accused together. The State must establish the applicable organizational theory, required intent and a listed underlying offense or conspiracy. Ordinary party liability is a separate analysis.
Explore this page 9 sections
Does knowing the other accused people prove a combination?
No. Social contact is not the statutory definition. Counsel should examine evidence of collaboration in criminal activities and the particular intent alleged, rather than equate association with guilt.
Can any underlying offense support Chapter 71?
The statute lists qualifying offenses. Identify the actual provision and its elements. A serious-sounding accusation is not enough if the prosecution has not established the required statutory connection.
What should counsel map separately?
Map the underlying offense, alleged combination or other route, and the accused’s individual role. Messages and transactions should be read in full context. This helps distinguish proof of one offense from proof of the additional organized-activity elements.
A practical example and questions for counsel
Hypothetical example: Suppose three friends are accused of a single underlying offense. Their number alone does not establish all Chapter 71 requirements. Counsel should examine the alleged collaboration in criminal activities, the statutory intent and the particular route charged, including applicable judicial interpretations. A photograph showing friendship is different from evidence of an agreement or continuing criminal collaboration. The defense should test both the underlying accusation and the organizational allegations. Successfully challenging one inference does not automatically dispose of every other theory, so the analysis should remain element-specific.
How this fits Texas law
Chapter 71 adds requirements beyond an underlying offense. It addresses specified intent involving a combination, or the listed gang or organization routes, together with committing or conspiring to commit a listed offense. A combination has a statutory definition involving at least three people. Multiple defendants do not automatically establish organized criminal activity.
How do I get started?
The first consultation is free. It is with a Director of Client Engagement, not an attorney. Clients who hire us work with an attorney. Call (214) 239-2013. Phones are answered 24/7, with AI covering when no staff is free.
Last updated October 2026
Common questions
Does knowing the other accused people prove a combination?
No.
Can any underlying offense support Chapter 71?
The statute lists qualifying offenses.
What should counsel map separately?
Map the underlying offense, alleged combination or other route, and the accused’s individual role.
Protecting Good People During Hard Times
Do not wait for your court date to get help. Call (214) 239-2013.
Phones are answered 24/7, with AI covering when no staff is free.
This page provides general information about Texas law. It is not legal advice, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship.