Protecting Good People During Hard TimesCall now, available 24/7
An affiliate of Martine LawCall (214) 239-2013

An affiliate of Martine Law, serving Texas, Minnesota, North Carolina and New Jersey. In Texas, legal services are provided by Texas Criminal Defense Attorneys PLLC, 325 N St. Paul Street, Suite 3129, Dallas, TX 75201.

Aggravated Assault by Threat Without Injury in Texas

Can Texas prosecute aggravated assault without an injury? Learn the requirements for threats and use or exhibition of a deadly weapon.

Published · Updated · Texas Criminal Defense Attorneys PLLC · Reviewed by the Marketing Team

In short: Yes. A qualifying intentional or knowing threat of imminent bodily injury, combined with use or exhibition of a deadly weapon during the assault, can support aggravated assault. The absence of a wound does not eliminate a threat-based charge, but the State must prove the actual elements.

Explore this page 9 sections

Does merely possessing a weapon prove the charge?

No. The prosecution must connect the weapon allegation to the assault. The manner of display, conduct and surrounding circumstances matter; lawful possession alone does not establish an unlawful threat.

Why does imminence matter?

Section 22.01(a)(2) addresses threatened imminent bodily injury. Counsel should examine the words, actions and circumstances instead of assuming that every angry statement meets that requirement.

What should a recording review include?

Review events before and after the alleged threat, audio clarity and what each participant could see or hear. A cropped clip may omit relevant context. Preserve the original and identify missing portions rather than editing a version intended to prove a preferred interpretation.

A practical example and questions for counsel

Hypothetical example: Suppose a video shows a weapon but does not capture the words spoken. The review must address both what the video proves and what additional evidence supplies the alleged threat of imminent injury. Silence on a recording can reflect missing audio rather than absence of a threat; a witness account can also be disputed. Counsel should compare the earliest statements, the full sequence and the circumstances of perception. Do not infer the entire offense from one still image or dismiss it solely because no one was physically hurt.

How this fits Texas law

Section 22.02 requires an assault plus serious bodily injury or use or exhibition of a deadly weapon. The underlying assault may involve injury or a qualifying threat. Aggravated assault is generally second degree, with listed first-degree circumstances. The weapon definition, actual manner of use and any claimed justification require separate analysis.

How do I get started?

The first consultation is free. It is with a Director of Client Engagement, not an attorney. Clients who hire us work with an attorney. Call (214) 239-2013. Phones are answered 24/7, with AI covering when no staff is free.

Last updated October 2026

Common questions

Does merely possessing a weapon prove the charge?

No.

Why does imminence matter?

Section 22.01(a)(2) addresses threatened imminent bodily injury.

What should a recording review include?

Review events before and after the alleged threat, audio clarity and what each participant could see or hear.

Protecting Good People During Hard Times

Do not wait for your court date to get help. Call (214) 239-2013.

Call (214) 239-2013

Phones are answered 24/7, with AI covering when no staff is free.

This page provides general information about Texas law. It is not legal advice, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Call (214) 239-2013En español